• Order
  • BHR
  • Offers
  • Support
    • Due to unforeseen circumstances, our phone line will be unavailable from 5pm to 9pm GMT on Thursday, 28th March. Please be assured that orders will continue to be processed as usual during this period. For any queries, you can still contact us through your customer portal, where our team will be ready to assist you.

      March 28, 2024

  • Sign In

Disclaimer: This is an example of a student written essay.
Click here for sample essays written by our professional writers.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UKEssays.com.

GPU-Accelerated Impact Maximization in Professional Networks

Paper Type: Free Essay Subject: Computer Science
Wordcount: 3190 words Published: 4th Apr 2018

Reference this

GPU-Accelerated Impact Maximization in Large-Scale Professional Networks

Dr. M. Rajasekhara, Babu B. V. Arunragavan

 

Abstract

Impact Maximization means to discover the top-K fascinating people to expand the impact spread inside a professional networks, which remains important yet difficult issue. Turned out to be NP-hard, the impact expansion issue pulls in gigantic studies. In spite of the fact that there exist fundamental eager calculations which may give great close estimation to ideal result, the ill effects of low computational proficiency and unnecessarily long execution time, restricting the application to substantial scale informal communities. In this paper, to quicken the impact boost by leveraging the parallel transforming ability of design handling unit (GPU). The enhancement of the current greedy calculations and outline a base up traversal calculation with GPU usage, which contains inbuilt parallelism. To best fit the proposed impact expansion calculation with the GPU construction modeling, we further create a versatile K-level mix technique to amplify the parallelism and redesign the impact chart to minimize the potential disparity. We do far reaching explores different avenues regarding both certifiable and professional network follows and show that with IMGPU model.

KEY WORDS:

Index Terms—Impact maximization, GPU, large-scale professional networks, IMGPU, bottom-up traversal algorithm.

INTRODUCTION:

The organizations, for example, linkedIN, visualCV and meetup play a critical part as productive media for quick spreading data, thoughts, and impact among gigantic population, and such impact has been significantly amplified with the quick increment of online clients. The organizations present extraordinary open doors for expansive scale viral advertising, a showcasing methodology that advances items through “verbal” impacts. While the force of professional systems has been investigated more to amplify the profit of viral showcasing, it gets to be crucial to understand how we can amplify the impact over the interpersonal organization.

Get Help With Your Essay

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!

Essay Writing Service

This issue, alluded to as impact amplification, is to choose inside a given interpersonal organization a little set of compelling people as beginning clients such that the normal number of affected clients, called impact spread, is expanded. The impact amplification issue is intriguing yet testing. Tis is turned out to be NP-hard and proposed a fundamental eager calculation that gives great rough guess to the ideal result. On the other hand, their methodology is genuinely restricted in productivity since it needs to run Monte-Carlo reproduction for extensively long time period to ensure a precise gauge.

Despite the fact that various progressive deliberations have been made to enhance the proficiency, condition of-the-craftsmanship methodologies still experience the ill effects of unreasonably long execution time because of the high-computational intricacy for large scale informal communities. Then again, representation preparing unit (GPU) has as of late been generally utilized as an issue broadly useful figuring gadget and indicated guaranteeing potential in quickening reckoning of chart issues. In this manner, The utilization of GPU to quicken the processing of the impact boost issue. Then again, the parallel handling ability of GPU can be completely misused in taking care of assignments with normal information access design. Sadly, the chart structures of generally real world organizations are very discontinuous, making GPU increasing speed a nontrivial assignment extreme execution debasement.

The primary difficulties of full GPU quickening lie in the accompanying viewpoints. In the first place, the parallelism of impact spread calculation for every conceivable seed set is restricted by the quantity of hubs at each one level. Consequently, the computational force of GPU can’t be completely misused on the off chance that we specifically outline issue to GPU for quickening. Second, as the level of hubs in generally social organizes essentially take after a force law dispersion, serious disparity between GPU strings will happen amid impact spread processing, genuinely corrupting the generally execution. Third, because of the unpredictable nature of true professional network, the memory gets to show poor spatial area, making it hard to fit the GPU computational model.

To address the above difficulties, we propose a Gpu accelerated impact expansion skeleton, IMGPU, which goes for completely leveraging the parallel preparing ability of GPU. We first change over the social chart into a regulated non-cyclic chart (DAG) to evade excess count. At that point a Bottom-up traversal calculation (BUTA) is outlined and mapped to GPU with CUDA programming model. Our methodology gives generous change to the current successive methodologies by exploiting the inalienable parallelism in handling hubs inside a informal community.

In light of the gimmick of the impact augmentation issue, we propose a set of versatile systems to investigate the most extreme limit of GPU and upgrade the execution of IMGPU. Specifically, we create a versatile K-level blend strategy to augment the parallelism among GPU strings. In the interim,

we redesign the chart by level and degree conveyance to minimize the potential uniqueness and blend the memory access to the most extreme degree. We direct broad explores different avenues regarding both true and manufactured social system follows. Contrasted and the condition of-the-workmanship calculation Mixgreedy, IMGPU attains up to 60 speedup in the execution time and has the capacity scale up to remarkably huge scale systems which were never expected with the current consecutive methodologies. As an issue, the commitments of this paper are predominantly twofold. First and foremost, we show BUTA, a proficient base up traversal calculation which contains inborn parallelism for the impact boost issue.

The BUTA to GPU building design to adventure the parallel transforming ability of GPU. Second, to best fit the GPU computational model, we propose a few viable streamlining systems to expand the parallelism, evade potential uniqueness, and blend memory access. The rest of this paper is composed as takes after: Area 2 gives preliminaries on impact expansion furthermore surveys related work. The IMGPU structure and relating GPU improvements are introduced in Section 3 furthermore Section 4, individually. We assess the IMGPU plan by far reaching tests and report the exploratory brings about Section 5.

2. PRELIMINARIES AND RELATED WORK

In this segment, we introduce preparatory prologue to influence maximization, and survey related work. In influence maximization, an on-line informal organization is demonstrated as an issue graph G =(V,E,W), where V= {v1,v2,v3 ) speaks to the set of nodes in the graph, each of which relates to an individual client. Every node can be either dynamic or idle, and will change from being idle to being dynamic on the off chance that it is influenced by others nodes. E & V Â V is a situated of directed edges speaking to the relationship between diverse clients. Take Linked-In as an illustration. A directed edge will be secured from node vi to vj , if vi is trailed by vj , shows that v j is open to get tweets from vi , and therefore may be influenced by vi . G =(V,E,W), where V= {v1,v2,v3 ) is the weight of every node which shows its commitment to the influence spread. The weight 137 is instated as 1 for every node, implying that if this node is influenced by different nodes, its commitment to the influence spread is 1.

The span of node set is n, and the quantity of edges is m. Node vi is known as a sink on the off chance that its out-degree is 0, and called a source on the off chance that its in-degree is 0. The independent cascade (IC) model is one of the most decently mulled over dispersion models. Given a beginning set S, the dissemination procedure of IC model unfolds as takes after: At step 0, just nodes in S are dynamic, while different nodes stay in the inert state. At step t, for every node vi which has recently changed from being inert to being dynamic, it has a solitary opportunity to enact every at present dormant neighbor v w , and succeeds with a likelihood . In the event that vi succeeds, v and w will get to be dynamic at step . In the event that v w has numerous recently initiated neighbours, their endeavours in actuating v w are sequenced in a subjective request. Such a procedure runs until no more actuations are conceivable We utilize to mean the influence spread of the introductory set S, which is characterized as the normal number of dynamic nodes toward the end of influence proliferation. Given a graph G =(V,E,W) and a parameter K, the influence maximization issue in the IC model is to choose a subset of persuasive nodes S & V of size K such that the influence spread is augmented toward the end of influence dissemination process.

We proposed Mixgreedy that diminishes the computational many-sided quality by registering the minor influence spread for every node G =(V,E,W) in one single reenactment. Mixgreedy first figures out if an edge would be chosen for engendering or not with a given likelihood. At that point all the edges not chose are evacuated to structure another graph G =(V,E,W) . With this treatment, the negligible addition from adding node vi to S is the quantity of nodes that are reachable from vi , however inaccessible from all the nodes in S. To process the influence spread for every node, a fundamental execution is doing BFS for all vertices’s which takes O(m,n) MixGreedy incorporates Cohen’s randomized algorithm for estimating the marginal influence spread for each node, and afterward selects the node that offers the maximal influence spread. Embracing the above streamlining methods, MixGreedy can run much faster. In any case, the change is not sufficiently viable to lessen execution time to an adequate range especially for huge scale professional networks. In addition, Cohen’s algorithm provides no precision ensure.

3 IMGPU FRAMEWORK

Here, we depict the IMGPU framework that empowers GPU-accelerated processing of influence maximization. Initially, we create BUTA that can exploit intrinsic parallelism and adequately lessen the complexity with guaranteed accuracy.

3.1BOTTOM-UP TRAVERSAL ALGORITHM

We can get another graph from the original graph after haphazardly selecting edges from G. As opposed to doing BFS for every node which is noticeably wasteful, we can find that the negligible impact calculation of every node just depends on its child node; subsequently, we could get the impact spreads for all the node by crossing the diagram just once in a bottom-up way. The level of a node vi, is:

We initially change over the graph to a DAG to keep away from repetitive computation and potential deadlock.

Fig. 1.Bottom-up traversal.

Fig. 2.Relation of nodes.

Algorithm 2 displays the points of interest of BUTA, where R signifies the quantity of Monte-Carlo simulations. In each round of recreation, the graph is initially reproduced by selecting edges at a given likelihood and changing over into a DAG Then we begin the bottom up traversal level by level We utilize the “in parallel” build to demonstrate the codes that can be executed in parallel by GPU. Impact spreads of all hubs at the same level can be ascertained in parallel and the mark of every hub is then decided for future cover reckoning. After R rounds of reenactment, the hub giving the maximal negligible increase will be chosen and added to the set S.

Fig. 3. Graph data representation.

The advantages of BUTA is that we can enormously decrease the time and BUTA can promise preferred accuracy over Mixgreedy as we precisely figure impact spread for every node while Mixgreedy approximates them from Cohen’s calculation.

3.2BASELINE GPU IMPLEMENTATION

In this area, we first depict the graph data structure utilized as a part of this work, and afterward discuss about the baseline implementation of IMGPU in point of interest.

3.2.1 DATA REPRESENTATION

To execute IMGPU over the GPU structural planning, the customary nearness lattice representation is not a decent decision particularly for large-scale social networks. The reasons are. First and foremost, it costs memory space which altogether confines the span of informal community that can be taken care of by GPU. Second, the dormancy of information exchange from host to gadget and worldwide memory access is high, corrupting the general execution. Therefore, we utilize the compressed sparse row (CSR) format which is generally utilizedfor scanty framework representation

3.2.2 BASELINE IMPLEMENTATION

The graph information is initially exchanged to the global memory of GPU. At that point, we allocate one string for every node to run the impact spread computation kerne. The impact spread processing bit meets expectations iteratively by level. Along these lines, the parallel handling ability of GPU is abused for impact maximization acceleration.

4 GPU-ORIENTED OPTIMIZATION

In this area, we analyze figures that influence the execution of benchmark GPU usage and give viable improvements to accomplish better performance.

4.1DATA REORGANIZATION

BUTA executes level by level in a bottomup manner. Strings in a twist are in charge of preparing diverse node. Then again, because of the SIMT peculiarity of GPU, strings in a warp execute the same direction at each one clock cycle. Subsequently, if strings in a twist are appointed to process hubs at distinctive levels, uniqueness will happen and affect diverse execution ways, which will essentially degrade the execution.

Likewise, amid BUTA execution, strings need to acquire the visit data and the impact spreads of their child nodes. As the degrees of hubs in genuine informal communities principally take after a force law dissemination, there may exist incredible difference between the level of distinctive nodes.

Such dissimilarity will seriously lessen the usage of GPU centers and corrupt the execution. To address these issues, we revamp the graph by presorting the graph, with the motivation behind making strings in a warp process nodes that are at the same level and with comparable degree however much as could reasonably be expected.

4.2ADAPTIVE K-LEVEL COMBINATION

Baseline IMGPU usage computes impact spreads of node from bottom up by level, and subsequently its parallelism is restricted by the quantity of node at each one level. We can advantage more if there are sufficient node having a place with the same level to be handled, overall the parallel preparing capacity of GPU would be underexploited. For most cases, there is satisfactory parallelism to adventure since this present reality interpersonal organization is normally of vast scale. Notwithstanding, there do exist some specific levels which just contain a little number of node because of the intrinsic graph irregularity of social networks.

4.3MEMORY ACCESS COALESCENCE

When we register the impact spread of a node, the string needs to get to the impact spreads of all the youngster node. Accordingly, for node with substantial degree, this will bring about countless gets to which will take long execution time. Such node, however representing a little rate of the whole graph, generously exist in a lot of people genuine social networks.

5 EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

In our experiments, we use traces professional networks of distinctive scales and diverse types, like LinkedIn We look at IMGPU and its advancement version IMGPU_O with the two existing eager algorithms and two heuristic algorithms, and Mixgreedy , ESMCE , PMIA, and Arbitrary. In addition, we also execute a CPU- based version of BUTA, alluded to as BUTA_CPU, to assess the execution of BUTA and the impact of parallelization. The itemized description of the information sets what’s more algorithms can be found in which is accessible in the on-line supplemental material.

6 CONCLUSION

In this paper, we present IMGPU, a novel structure that accelerates influence maximization for professional network in-order to spread the job notification by exploiting GPU. Specifically, we design a bottom up traversal algorithm, BUTA, which significantly reduces the computational unpredictability and contains inalienable parallelism. To adaptively fit BUTA with the GPU building design, we also investigate three viable optimizations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that IMGPU significantly reduces the execution time of the existing sequential influence maximization algorithm while keeping up satisfying influence spread.

REFERENCES

[1] D. Bader and K. Madduri, “GTgraph: A Suite of Synthetic GraphGenerators,” http://www.cse.psu.edu/madduri/software/GTgraph/, Nov. 2012.

[2] W. Chen, Y. Wang, and S. Yang, “Efficient Influence Maximizationin Social Networks,” Proc. ACM Int’l Conf. Knowledge Discovery andData Mining (SIGKDD), pp. 199-208, 2009.

[3] W. Chen, C. Wang, and Y. Wang, “Scalable Influence Maximiza-tion for Prevalent Viral Marketing in Large-Scale Social Net-works,” Proc. ACM Int’l Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining(SIGKDD), pp. 1029-1038, 2010.

[4] N. Bell and M. Garland, “Efficient Sparse Matrix-Vector Multi-plication on CUDA,” Technical Report NVR-2008-04, NVIDIA,Dec. 2008.

[5] E. Cohen, “Size-Estimation Framework with Applications toTransitive Closure and Reachability,” J. Computer and SystemSciences, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 441-453, 1997.

[6] P. Domingos and M. Richardson, “Mining the Network Value ofCustomers,” Proc. ACM Int’l Conf. Knowledge Discovery and DataMining (SIGKDD), pp. 57-66, 2001.

[7] J. Barnat, P. Bauch, L. Brim, and M. Ceska, “ComputingStrongly Connected Components in Parallel on CUDA,” Proc.IEEE 25th Int’l Parallel Distributed Processing Symp. (IPDPS), pp.544-555, 2011.

 

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on UKEssays.com then please: