• Order
  • BHR
  • Offers
  • Support
    • Our offices and phone lines will close at 5PM GMT on the 6th and 7th of December. Rest assured, this does not impact any previously confirmed delivery dates. You can still place orders as usual on our websites. We greatly appreciate your understanding and cooperation!

      December 6, 2023

  • Sign In

Disclaimer: This is an example of a student written essay.
Click here for sample essays written by our professional writers.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UKEssays.com.

Free Will And Euthanasia Philosophy Essay

Paper Type: Free Essay Subject: Philosophy
Wordcount: 1204 words Published: 1st Jan 2015

Reference this

If we are to have free will, that free will should include not only how we live our lives, but how long we live them. (Taylor, 2003).Unlike what the quote stated, Kevorkian failed to recognize the ethical and moral obligation in euthanasia.

On 18th November 1926, Mahatma Gandhi said:

“I see there is an instinctive horror of killings things under any circumstances whatever. For instance, an alternative has been suggested in the shape of confining even rabid dogs in a certain place and allowing them to die a slow death. Now my idea of compassion makes this thing impossible for me. I cannot for a moment bear to see a dog, or for that matter any other living being, helplessly suffering the torture of a slow death. I do not kill a human being thus circumstanced because i have more helpful remedies. I should kill a dog similarly situated because in its case I am without a remedy. Should my child be attacked with rabies and there is no helpful remedy to relieve his agony, I should consider is my duty to take his life.”

Get Help With Your Essay

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!

Essay Writing Service

The term or word “Euthanasia” in Greek means to die in comfort, without pain (eu = good, ‘thantos’ =die). The term also refers to the work of a medical doctor to ‘lessen’ the suffering of a patient during death. Euthanasia, today is sometimes known as ‘mercy killing’, usually by lethal injection with the sole intention to hasten the death to end a patient`s suffering. We all know that we, as human beings, are not immortal and for that reason, we will die one day. Death awaits us all, in other words. For some people, deaths can come all of a sudden and under a quite comfortable situation. However, for some others, it comes after a prolonged pain and suffering. This situation creates fear of death.

Death of a person is one of the most important things that religions deal with. All faiths offer meaning and explanations for death and dying, other than that, all faiths also try to find a place for death and dying within human experience. For those left behind when someone dies religions provide rituals to mark death, and ceremonies to remember those who have died. Religions provide understanding and comfort for those who are facing death. Religions regard understanding death and dying as vital to finding meaning in human life. Dying is often seen as an occasion for getting powerful spiritual insights as well as for preparing for whatever afterlife may be to come.

There are many different religious views on euthanasia, although many moral theologians are critical of the procedure. Most religions disapprove of euthanasia. Some of them absolutely forbid it. The Roman Catholic Church, for example, is one of the most active organisations in opposing euthanasia. he declaration on Euthanasia is the Roman Catholic Church’s official document on the topic of euthanasia, a statement that was issued as by the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 1980. Catholic teaching condemns euthanasia as a “crime against life”. The teaching of the Catholic Church on euthanasia rests on several core principles of Catholic ethics, including the sanctity of human life, the dignity of the human person, concomitant human rights, due proportionality in casuistic remedies, the unavoidability of death, and the importance of charity.

Virtually all religions state that those who become vulnerable through illness or disability deserve special care and protection, and that proper end of life care is a much better thing than euthanasia.

Religions are opposed to euthanasia for a number of reasons.

God has forbidden it

virtually all religions with a supreme God have a command from God in their scriptures that says ‘you must not kill’

this is usually interpreted as meaning ‘you must not kill innocent human beings’

this rules out euthanasia (and suicide) as well as murder, as carrying out any of these would be against God’s orders, and would be an attack on the sovereignty of God.

Human life is sacred

human lives are special because God created them

therefore human life should be protected and preserved, whatever happens

therefore we shouldn’t interfere with God’s plans by shortening human lives

Human life is special

human beings are made in God’s image

therefore they have a special value and dignity

this value doesn’t depend on the quality of a particular life

taking a life violates that special value and dignity

even if it’s one’s own life

even if that life is full of pain and suffering

Eastern religions

Some Eastern religions take a different approach. The key ideas in their attitudes to death are achieving freedom from mortal life, and not-harming living beings. Euthanasia clearly conflicts with the second of these, and it interferes with the first.

Freedom from mortal life

Hinduism and Buddhism see mortal life as part of a continuing cycle in which we are born, live, die, and are reborn over and over again

the ultimate aim of each being is to get free of this cycle, and so be completely liberated from the material world

during each cycle of life and death human beings make progress towards their ultimate liberation

how they live and how they die play a vital part in deciding what their next life will be, and so in shaping their journey to liberation

shortening life interferes with the working out of the laws that govern this process (the laws of karma), and so interferes with a human being’s journey to liberation

Warning: this ‘explanation’ is very over-simplified; there’s much more to these religious ideas than is written here.

Non-harm – the principle of ahimsa

Hinduism and Buddhism regard all life (not just human life) as involved in the process above

therefore they say that we should try to avoid harming living things

this rules out killing people, even if they want to die

The sanctity of life

Religious people often refer to the sanctity of life, or say that human life is sacred. They usually mean something like this:

God gives people life, so only God has the right to take it away.

You can look at that sentence in several ways. Here are three:

God gave us our lives

we owe our lives to God

God is the final authority over our lives

we must not interfere in the ending of our lives

God is intimately involved in our lives

God was intimately involved in our births

God will be intimately involved in our deaths

it would be wrong to try and shut God out of our dying

we should not interfere in the way God has chosen for our lives to end

God gave us our lives

we are only stewards of our bodies, and are responsible to God for them

we must use our bodies as God intended us to

we must allow our lives (our stewardship) to end at the time and in the way God wants.


Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on UKEssays.com then please: